Search Box

Wednesday, November 24, 2010

Fascism


Forty years ago, it was customary for leftist students to denounce Richard Nixon's White House and those who supported him as "fascist pigs." The students who threw this adjective around hadn't bothered to research it, and didn't really understand fascism any better than they understood any political system. They just knew that "fascist" was a word associated with right wing regimes, and that it was fashionable to hate anything conservative.

But here is the definition of "fascist," from Wiktionary:

"A political regime, having totalitarian aspirations, ideologically based on a relationship between business and the centralized government, business-and-government control of the market place, repression of criticism or opposition, a leader cult and exalting the state and/or religion above individual rights. Originally only applied (usually capitalized) to Benito Mussolini's Italy."
    Does this sound more like today's liberals or conservatives? Is it the Democrats or the Republicans who wants to put business under the control of a centralized government? Which party wants more government control of the market place? Which side wants to repress criticism by shutting down certain media? Which party has had a leader cult recently (complete with Soviet-style portraits)?

    Fascist pigs!

    5 comments:

    Anonymous said...

    Which party does government funded radio and television support?

    - Ed

    John Craig said...

    Ed -- Good point.

    Anonymous said...

    As a Fascist I find it an insult to be compared to Liberalism and neo-liberalism. A Fascist is indeed a conservative, but we are radical. We want to destroy the social forces, movements, and institutions that threaten to destroy the healthy parts of a society.

    We are against frivolous wars but we are also against the anti-war movement which supports unilateral disarmament and open borders.

    We support the unity that comes from a segregated society that marches under a shared banner. We are separate, unequal, but united.

    We support the family unit, education for both genders, free participation and association for both genders, but we do not advocate the lies of feminism. Our women are strong, intelligent, and uncoerced by an ideology that is forced upon them.

    We despise drug use and will use any tactics which lower its spread (be it legalization or heavy prohibition)

    The internet must be monitored and controlled, but I personally believe in counselling those found viewing leftist media rather than imprisoning or killing them.

    We support a regulated free market and nationalization of societal goods, but we do not use this tactic as a means of redistribution of wealth, we use it to ensure the preservation of societal goods like culture, environment, national propaganda (as opposed to international propaganda of world jewery, international socialism, and liberal cosmopolitanism)energy and banking.

    We understand that society is contingent upon a propaganda war and that the vast majority do not seek the truth, they seek propaganda. The Left claims to seek the truth, (and they honestly think they do), but through this worldview and mindstate, they inevitably reject it because cosmopolitan liberalism and universalism as movements were designed (by Jews and Freemasons) as tools of control and propaganda rather than actual prescriptions for society. The uninitiated, however, view these theories as honest economic models of the "enlightenment movement".

    Conservatives continually fall victim to tools of jewery and are themselves tools as well (neo-conservatism, neo-liberalism, libertarianism) A conservative must be Nationalist, they must be paleoconservative only, otherwise they are simply playing the game of the Left which is anti-racism, anti-fascism, internationalism, centerism, and neo-liberalism.

    Only when a country is controlled by its native citizens and not by jewry will we be able to have a coherent and functioning politic. This is not about liberal vs "conservative" it is about invader vs inhabitant and right now, the West is occupied territory. Europe must unite as a a segregated whole to combat international socialism and establish national socialism.

    I understand you may find my comments to be inappropriate for a non-racist blog such as yourself (acknowledging IQ differences does not make you a racist) but I ask that you approve my comment and allow me to speak my piece.

    John Craig said...

    Anon --
    All comments are approved as long as they relate to the post.

    I had to read your comment three times before fully grasping where you're coming from. You're really a National Socialist more than a fascist, though I wouldn't want to get into a squabble about semantics with you.

    As far as your fascism goes -- and you are one, though the other label would probably fit better -- you have an interesting viewpoint. You want many of the same types of government controls that the liberals do, but you want them to push in the opposite direction. It's an interesting viewpoint, one that certainly doesn't get much press.

    But I'm going to stand by the argument that today's liberals are also fascists in their own way.

    I don't agree with a lot of your positions, but I admire your forthrightness (even if you did comment anonymously). And I certainly agree with everything you said about liberal propaganda and feminist lies.

    What I was talking about in this post was mostly just the hypocrisy of the liberals in throwing the word "fascist" around so freely while not really understanding it, and not realizing that they are themselves far more fascist than most conservatives.

    Anyway, thanks for your input.

    Anonymous said...

    Thank you for approving my post and responding constructively, I expected no less from an admirable beta male such as yourself (that is a partial comment as betas tend to be more open minded and hold an unauthoritarian view of knowledge).

    I commented anonymously simply because it is always my go to choice for websites that I have not signed up as a member for.

    I highly recommend you research and understand the Jewish Question and anti-semitism. Metapedia is a good place to start.

    You yourself are open to race analysis, Jews are a very distinct race and very sociopathic in nature. They have always been kicked out and persecuted by societies throughout history for the same reasons. They were also heavily involved in the slave trade, Christopher Columbus, or Christopher Colon, was a Jew. Many Portuguese colonialists were Jews that pretended to be converted to Catholicism. You will find many quotes, easily found on Metapedia for an expedient read, that illustrate the parasitic, sociopathic pro-slave mentality of Jews.

    Ironically, it was a circle of Jews that founded the NAACP, it was a circle of Jews that founded the Bolshevik Party, it was a circle of Jews who wrote the first 2nd wave Feminist Theories, it was a circle of Jews who wrote the first Anarcho-Socialist Theories, it was a circle of Jews that started the Right Wing Libertarian Movement, it was a circle of Jews who organized the Republican Party under Neo-Conservativism and cloaked with their most despised opponent; white patriots. It was a circle of Jews that started the Council on Foreign Relations and the Trilateral Commission. It was a circle of Jews that started Socialist International. The Rothschilds are Jews. All the major investment banks, movie studios, record labels, and universities are headed by Jews.

    Yes, I am a racist and anti-semite, but I pursue the truth wherever it leads with the love of life and a healthy curiosity and skepticism at my side.