Search Box

Wednesday, March 15, 2017

Test for racism:

The following article, Man beaten to pulp after offering to pay for attackers' meal, appeared in this afternoon's NY Post:

A good Samaritan ​who ​offered to lend two men short on cash a couple bucks to cover their meal at a Brooklyn eatery ended up beaten and robbed for trying to help, cops say.

The victim was savagely beaten by four men inside a Flatbush fried-chicken joint — and then robbed by a fifth as he lay helpless on the floor, cops say.

The 37-year-old victim told police that an argument began when he offered to help pay for the two men’s meal, which they were a few dollars short of paying for, inside Texas Chicken and Burgers in Flatbush on March 1.

The two men got angry at the offer and soon grabbed the victim’s cane and began striking him in the head and body with it and their fists, police said.

The men pummeled the victim harder when he tried to defend himself, and soon two other men entered the location to join in the beating.

When the attackers fled, another man entered the Texas Chicken and Burgers spot and emptied the victim’s pockets before fleeing, police said.

The victim was taken to an area hospital, where he was treated for multiple broken bones, contusions and lacerations.

No names were named, and no races were mentioned. If, despite this, you jumped to a conclusion about the races of the perpetrators, then you're a racist.

It doesn't make any difference if any of the various stereotypes have any truth to them. The point is, if you notice patterns at all, you're a bad person

And if you thought anything along the lines of "Aw Christ, when are people going to learn?" -- you're a particularly bad person.

You may not have heretofore realized how bad you are, but, trust me, you are. 

If you are curious as to whether you're right, you can click on the link above and watch a video of the beating. 

And if you're curious as to the identity of the victim, his photograph is in this article

But, again, all of that is irrelevant. If while reading this article you had any thoughts other than, "Our diversity is our strength," you're evil. End of story. 


Anonymous said...

I didn't perform the test, I am merely assuming that the victim was white and that the violent attackers were black.

The which being said, I am so racist that I AM GLAD that a white person who tried to aid black persons got severely injured in the process.

White people like that deserve very bad treatment from all sentient beings, in my view. They are FAIR GAME and too stupid to bueno...

Pain is the universe telling them, "PAY ATTENTION!"

====Fake Baba

Smallberries Worldwide said...

Well it looks like reparations go both ways, we get paid back also.

John Craig said...

Fake Baba --
I had another white person tell me (not via the comment board) that same thing, essentially, and he even added that he would have joined in with the black attackers to teach the white a lesson.

(You got outpsychopathed.)

Mark Caplan said...

According to folklore, hitting a mule over the head with a two-by-four gets its attention. But even after the white liberal was thrashed with his own cane, he still ends up asking, "Why did you have to beat me up? What was the reason for that?"

John Craig said...

Small berries --

John Craig said...

Mark --
Ah, but did you stop to consider, perhaps he was asking the question rhetorically?

(He should have been.)

Anonymous said...

Why the man even offered to pay for their meal boggles my mind. So what if the grown men couldn't afford to pay for the meal. That's on them. Also, they weren't starving. The best thing to do, keep quiet.


John Craig said...

Birdie --
I suspect that victim won't be making the same mistake again.

Anonymous said...

You never know.

- birdie

Anonymous said...

What does this all mean though?
I have noticed black people in the USA also somehow differ from black africans.

John, do you also think difference in race also vary in sub-races? I think Russians and Slavs definitely are less intelligent than Germans and other Germanics.

British people are definitely either very pretty or very ugly while it's more evenly distributed in the French.

John Craig said...

Anon --
Sure, there are differences between ethnicities, though they are less pronounced than between the races.

I've heard others say that about the Russians and Slavs, though I don't have a strong opinion on that. (I've actually argued against that with someone, using the existence of Tolstoy and Dostoevsky and Tchaikovsky etc. as proof that they are equally capable; but the guy I was arguing with had some good points too.)

Interesting observation about the Brits vs. the French, I'd never thought of that before, but it rings true. I'd say some of that has to do with the fact that there are more doughy Brits than French, which may have partly to do with diet, but also partly to do with the fact that the French smoke more.

Smallberries Worldwide said...

John smallberries, buckaroo banzai movie reference.

Anonymous said...

But, these WERE five black males attacking a white, cane-bound male.

So the truth is racist?

John Craig said...

Anon --
That seems to be the world works these days. Or, at least, how "racism" is defined.

Pangur said...

Voluntarily interacting with blacks seems like a bad deal for whites. My sense is that this stuff will be tolerated until it suddenly isn't, at which point we wake up in a different world.

John Craig said...

Pangur --
Hmm.....I wonder. I agree that things can't keep going the way they are now. More and more people seem to be "woke" to the reality of race relations, to use the Left's term.

Pangur said...


Right, no-one knows what's coming next, but the left's attempts to delegitimize the current admin don't help.

John Craig said...

Pangur --
Yes, every time I see the left make another attempt -- and it's pretty much nonstop -- I wonder what the reaction would have been had the Right tried to attack Obama the same way. But, of course, expecting any sort of equivalence is just silly.

PB said...

CCTV be racis'.

ArthurinCali said...

At this point, ignoring the obvious seems to be a full time job for most in society. This just makes the problems harder to solve and the eventual response more harsh.

John Craig said...

Arthur --
Exactly. it takes a lot effort to keep the blinders on all the time. The massive cognitive dissonance doesn't seem to bother the Left, though.

Luqman said...

As far as noticing goes, I've seen a lot of the "white victim, black attackers" noticing. Hell, pretty much everyone realizes it, they just don't say it. That's why the reaction is so faux incredulous and moralizing when one does say it, because everyone knows the truth.

For something a bit more edgy and out of sight, the guy has HIV, meaning he is almost certainly homosexual. Why should we assume good intentions for him? American black males seem to be particularly sensitive to this stuff (attributing it, paedophilia and various sexual kinks to white people). It could be he gave off some vibes they didn't like, or he had some other intentions.

Usually the homophobia angle is played wherever it can be, even when the perpetrators are non-white.

John Craig said...

Luqman --
Yes, that was my thought, in fact Im writing another post about that right now. this could have started out as just an old-fashioned gay bashing. But then the other two guys who saw what was going on throughout he restaurant window and came in wouldn't have known that, with them it was just racial.

Rona said...

I'd say that on the whole Slavs are less intelligent than Germanics, but it seems to vary a lot between nations. For example, average IQ in both Germany and Poland is above 100 while many Eastern European nations and Scandinavians score in the 90s. Of nations scoring above 100, Germans score higher than Slavs and of nations scoring 90-100 Slavs score lower than Scandinavians. Still, there are Slavic nations whose average IQ is higher than some Germanic nations. Russians seems to have considerable disfunctional underclass but remember that, in spite of horrific economic system, they managed to have pretty impressive military and space technology in 20th century, created in original way different from western tech, and also rival Americans when it came to many scientific fields.

Not that it takes much to provoke black violence, but I can see adult black men feeling humiliated that a white crusader would throw a few dollars at them and go about his day feeling virtuous about caring for the black folk. Especially if he had that liberal air about him, where you feel you're just a prop in his virtue-signaling. Now maybe this was just a decent white man who would help anybody and in either case the beating is savage but if I didn''t have enough money to pay for a meal in a fast food, I'd want to leave, not be engaged by a do gooder offering to pay my meal in front of everyone.

John Craig said...

Rona --
"Especially if he had that liberal air about him, where you feel you're just a prop in his virtue-signaling" -- well put.

I wonder how often blacks feel that way. It can't be all that rare.

The answer to the Russian question is probably just that they simply have a wide and not particularly high bell curve. You're right, I was thinking artistically, but Sputnik, Aeroflot, et al are better proof of their brains.

Anonymous said...

There is more evidence to subrace variation. The Germanic tribes that would become the English easily took over the British isles pushing the primitive celts back who would charge into battle naked covered in dye. To this day there is a lot of hooliganism in Scotland compared to England.

This is a quote by Benjamin Disraeli on the irish:
[The Irish] hate our free and fertile isle. They hate our order, our civilisation, our enterprising industry, our sustained courage, our decorous liberty, and our pure religion. The wild, reckless, indolent, uncertain and superstitious race have no sympathy with the English character. Their fair ideal of human felicity is an alteration of clannish brawls and coarse idolatry. Their history describes an unbroken circle of bigotry and blood.’

"I am haunted by the human chimpanzees I saw along that hundred miles of horrible see white chimpanzees is dreadful; if they were black one would not see it so much, but their skins, except where tanned by exposure, are as white as ours."
Charles Kingsley

One would wonder why they historically lived for ages primitively like black africans despite being right next to the thriving culture of the British. It is no wonder that they were historically referred to as "white negroes". Their alcoholism only adding to the troubles of their history. (But I still believed the famine imposed on them was never justified, it was genocide)

John Craig said...

Anon --
I was surprised when I first heard that the average Irish IQ was 95; that's an astounding difference given that they look more or less like other Brits. And I've never noticed a cognitive difference with the Irish-Americans I've met. But, that IQ difference is evidently real.

At the same time, Disraeli and Kingsley weren't exactly disinterested observers, there was a certain amount of "sibling" rivalry going on there, plus Disraeli, as a Jew, may have felt somewhat the same way about the English themselves.

I remember seeing a list of the 100 people who had had the most influence on the world, from maybe 35 years ago, and the Scots actually topped the list with seven people, which meant they were punching way above their weight given their relatively mall population. (Don't ask me to name the seven people.)

Happy St. Patrick's Day.

Anonymous said...

If anything that 95 IQ (it may actually be 93) was raised by intermixing with the English and other groups who have gone to Ireland, it must have been much lower in the past. Possibly though an explanation has been brain drain, but the largest emigrant group to the USA historically are the Germans who still have a higher IQ. And most of the immigrants from Ireland over the centuries has been the poor rabble, so why hasn't it gone up?
It is not merely modern, the comments on Irish people go all the way back to the middle ages:

"They use their fields mostly for pasture. Little is cultivated and even less is sown. The problem here is not the quality of the soil but rather the lack of industry on the part of those who should cultivate it. This laziness means that the different types of minerals with which hidden veins of the earth are full are neither mined nor exploited in any way. They do not devote themselves to the manufacture of flax or wool, nor to the practice of any mechanical or mercantile act. Dedicated only to leisure and laziness, this is a truly barbarous people. They depend on animals for their livelihood and they live like animals."
Gerald of Wales 1185

Anonymous said...

There are also true stereotypes about other european ethnicites. The Germans have historically been an incredibly violent nation, but in an organized and professional way. They have waged numerous wars and warfare seems to be in their blood. But it has quite changed.

The Scandinavians have been incredibly cruel and violent, living off raiding and pillaging others during the viking days, to the point of excess. Now they are 1st world countries with high living standards.

John Craig said...

Anonymous --
I have absolutely no numbers to back me up here, but I"m surprised Germans have been the largest emigrant group to the US. It's always been my vague impression that there are more whites with English surnames than German ones. But again, that's just a vague impression.

Funny comment by Gerald of Wales.

The current crop of Germans seem to be almost a reaction AGAINST what they've stood for int he past. In the past 40 or so years they've remained industrious and inventive, but politically, it seems they were brainwashed into liberalism, though the recent immigrant problems seem to be waking them up from that long slumber.

The current Scandinavians, too, seem to represent the opposite of their past, what with Swedish men urinating sitting down so as not to lift the toilet seats against the wishes of their females, and their currently crazy rape laws, which seem to allow for "regret rape."

Anonymous said...

So their inner predisposition is suppressed?

Anonymous said...

God forbid the Scandinavians and Germans crack and return to their racial predispositions. Since it's been pent up it will be incredibly destructive.

John Craig said...

Anon --
It seems that all Western European (and European-American) people's inner feelings have to be suppressed these days. They all have to pretend that they like other races better than their own, and that their own people are the worst people in the word for having committed the cardinal sin of "racism." To pass the test of political correctness they must put binders on and act as if they think they are better off with savages who hate them in their midst.