The woman hurling all of these accusations, Virginia Roberts, was never a "sex slave" -- she was a prostitute. A slave is chattel, has no freedom, and is owned by another person. At age 17, Roberts was reportedly paid $15,000 to have sex with Prince Andrew. That's not slavery; that's hooking.
At least the Post had the sense to put quotation marks around "sex slave." (It's not clear why they did the same for "black girls.")
Prince Andrew’s freaky financier pal Jeffrey Epstein was not only a pedophile but a bedroom bigot, too, according to a woman who claims she was his teen “sex slave.”
Epstein would bed as many as seven young girls — some as young as 12 — each day, but never black girls, Virginia Roberts told her lawyers, according to a transcript of the conversation that was filed in court.
If billionaire Epstein bedded 12-year-old girls, then he should go to jail for child molestation. (He has already served one sentence for that crime.)
But the concept of a "bedroom bigot" is one of the most inane I've heard in a while. The vast majority of people have a "type" that they are attracted to. This isn't a matter of choice, but of instinct.
If someone who prefers white girls is a "bedroom bigot," then are gay people "bedroom sexists?" After all, they want to exclude the other gender when it comes to their sex lives.
(Aren't we supposed to be an "inclusive" society?)
Are 20-year-olds who don't want to go to bed with 70-year-olds "bedroom ageists?"
And are people who prefer slim sex partners "bedroom weight-ists?"
I could go on, but you get the point: political correctness = insanity.
There's a corollary to that rule: people who use political correctness to advance their personal fortunes are dishonest manipulators.
My guess, and it's only a guess: Roberts tried to get Epstein to buy her silence, he refused to pay up, and so now she's coming public with her "revelations."
Shame on the Post for allowing her to do so through them.