Search Box

Monday, May 23, 2011

Lance

A friend wrote last night, "It is hard to imagine that three people who were all very close to him [Lance Armstrong] are all lying." 

It is hard to imagine. It's even harder to imagine that all three men -- Floyd Landis, Frankie Andreu, and now Tyler Hamilton -- all of whom have confessed to their own doping, would have been doing that while their team leader Lance Armstrong remained clean. My guess is that had his teammates doped while Armstrong remained clean, he would have turned them in.

I said back in November that I'm convinced Lance Armstrong is a sociopath.

Again, what betrays Armstrong's sociopathy is not his willing participation in a dirty sport, it's the way he treats others and the way he presents himself.

Cycling is unquestionably the dirtiest of sports. While the article on Armstrong took up a complete half page of this morning's NY Times sports section, three pages later there was a tiny one and a half inch mention of how Albert Contador had "extended his commanding lead" in the Giro d'Italia. Contador tested positive for steroids earlier but claimed that was a result of having eaten tainted beef. He has also evidently failed a new test which shows that his blood was at one time stored in a plastic container (meaning he was blood doping).

But he cycles on.

At this point it looks as if the only way to clean up cycling would be to abolish the sport entirely.

That obviously won't happen. But in the meantime, it's looking more likely that Armstrong will be spending time in prison for fraud, conspiracy, drug trafficking, and money laundering.

We can only hope he gets caught lying to the grand jury as well.

4 comments:

Dave Moriarty said...

i am convinced that those blessed with extraordinary talent are also "blessed" with extraordinary arrogance which makes them feel invulnerable to normal restraints. in osrt of an odd sense of balance one is given great gifts but also an emotional hole to create more disaster than the gifts can bring.

John Craig said...

Dave --
You're right about the arrogance, but I'm not even sure how "talented" Armstrong would have been without the drugs. There are just too many cases of mediocre athletes who dope and then become "great." We'll never know with Armstrong, I guess.

Anonymous said...

If they're all doing it, does it really matter? I guess the answer is that they're not all doing it, they're lying about it, and it encourages the use of PED's and doping among younger people. I just don't feel outraged by it, though.

John Craig said...

Anonymous --
You make a good point. Since they're all doing it, it makes for a more level playing field, and as I said in the previous post on Armstrong, I'm less outraged by doping in cycling than I am by doping in, say, swimming, where it's less widespread.