Search Box

Friday, November 4, 2016

Election fraud

A friend just sent this article about a California man who found 83 unused ballots, each with a different name on it, but all with the same address -- the two bedroom apartment of an 89-year old woman who lives in the same complex.

The ballots were returned to the Post Office, but it's hard to imagine any way in which this wasn't intended to be a purposeful fraud.

This follows on the heels of NYC Board of Elections Commissioner Alan Schulkin admitting that voter fraud is rampant in New York City, that voters from certain (black, Hispanic, and Chinese) neighborhoods are bused around to vote several times each.

And there have been some reports that some voters who tried to vote Republican had the voting machines switch their votes to Democrat.

We'll probably hear a lot more of these types of reports by the time election season is over.

In the meantime, don't forget, asking voters to show an ID is racist!

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

This collection of 94 videos on how elections are rigged just came through from the Email list for Pat Buchanan's columns. I haven't gone through it yet.

- Ed

John Craig said...

Thank you Ed. I just took a quick look at it, it really does make your blood boil. The Republicans and the Democrats play by two different sets of rules.

Anonymous said...

There have been stories already in the news about people committing election fraud.

- Susan

John Craig said...

Susan --
If you take a quick look at the list that Ed sent in, it's incredible how many ways there are of rigging the vote. At every single level of the vote they can commit fraud. First, in registering (dead, noncitizen, and registered in multiple jurisdictions) voters. Second, in having people show up to vote at different polling places. Third, in voting machines which are programmed to "erroneously" switch a vote from Republican to Democrat. And fourth, in the computer which amass the total number of votes.

It's amazing to me that in 2012, all those different inner city wards in Philadelphia reported 99% turnout, and nobody said a thing because they didn't want to be accused of "racism." There's been no election in recent US history (that I know of) which has had more than 75% turnout, and historically it's been lower in the inner city.

Anonymous said...

When we vote, I expect these voting machines to accurately register our votes. I've heard that George Soros is somehow connected to the voting machines. It would probably be best to simply have paper ballots.

- Susan

John Craig said...

Susan --
Agree completely. Paper ballots seem more reliable. I've gotten mixed reports on the Soros voting machines, his connection with the man who owns the company is that they serve on the same board of some international aid organization, so I'm not sure how close it really is. It could be that the guy is his puppet; or it could be that it's a tenuous, coincidental connection. I just don't know. I've also heard that that company is nothing to be used for the general election (it was in the primaries). Of course, this doesn't mean that the new voting machine company isn't just as tainted.