Search Box

Thursday, September 14, 2017

Mary Bell

While reading that list of freed serial killers mentioned in the previous post, I learned about Mary Bell. Evidently she is quite famous in England; she is less well known in this country.

At age 11, Bell strangled 4-year-old Martin Brown, and a few months later, 3-year-old Brian Howe. Bell used a pair of scissors to carve an "M" into Howe's stomach, cut off some of his hair, and mutilate his penis. Mary had a weak-minded friend, Norma Bell (no relation) who accompanied her, but Mary was the leader.


You couldn't have asked for a more fertile background for sociopathy than Mary's. Her biological father is unknown, and her mother, Betty, was a prostitute who was often away. Betty is thought to have tried to kill Mary on several occasions, while trying to make it look like an accident. From Wiki:

Her family was suspicious when Mary "fell" from a window, and when she "accidentally" consumed sleeping pills. On one such occasion, an independent witness saw Betty giving the pills to her daughter as sweets. Mary herself says she was subjected to repeated sexual abuse, her mother forcing her from the age of four to engage in sexual acts with men.

In any case, there's absolutely no doubt about Bell's character. She was obviously not responsible for her own family background, but it is what shaped her, and the end result was a sociopath. And, as we all know, sociopaths always remain sociopaths.

But what's most interesting about Bell is how she's behaved apart from the two murders she committed -- both as a young girl, and since she was released from prison at age 23, in 1980, and granted anonymity (via a new name). This account from Murderpedia includes excerpts from several articles and books about how she presented herself, how she thought, and what impressions people had of her.

It's a wonderful case study in how sociopaths act.

From An Encyclopedia of Serial Killers -- Hunting Humans, by Michael Newton:

Described by court psychiatrists as "intelligent, manipulative, and dangerous," Mary proved herself a problem inmate. In 1970, she fabricated charges of indecent assault against one of her warders, but the man was acquitted in court. In September 1977, she escaped from Moor Court open prison with another inmate, but the runaways were captured three days later. 

False rape charges are a sociopathic female specialty. And keep in mind, Mary was only 13 when she fabricated those charges.

From Mary Bell: Portrait of a Killer as a Young Girl, by Shirly Lynn Scott:

"Are you looking for your Brian?" asked Mary Bell. Brian's sister, Pat, was worried about the missing toddler, who should have been home by now. A small, three-year-old boy with fair hair, Brian Howe usually played close to home. Mary and her best friend, Norma, eagerly offered to help search for him. They led Pat through the neighborhood, looking here and there, all the while knowing exactly where Brian was.

They crossed the railroad tracks to the industrial area, where the kids of Scotswood often played among construction materials, old cars, and dangerous wreckage. Pat was worried -- only a few weeks ago little Martin Brown was found dead inside of a condemned house. Mary pointed to some large concrete blocks. "He might be playing behind the blocks, or between them," she said.

"Oh no, he never goes there," insisted Norma. In fact, Brian lay dead between the blocks. Mary wanted Pat to discover her dead brother, Norma later said, "because she wanted Pat Howe to have a shock." But Pat decided to leave. The Newcastle Police would find his body at 11:10 later that night.


Serial killers often like to savor the pain of grieving relatives; and at age 11, Bell had all of those instincts.

Brian Howe was buried on August 7th. Detective Dobson was there: "Mary Bell was standing in front of the Howe's house when the coffin was brought out. I was, of course, watching her. And it was when I saw her there that I knew I did not dare risk another day. She stood there, laughing. Laughing and rubbing her hands. I thought, My God, I've got to bring her in, she'll do another one."

Once again, savoring the pain of the bereaved.


"I couldn't kill a bird by the neck or throat or anything, it's horrible that.
-- Mary Bell


This is a little reminiscent of double murderer Frederick Baer claiming, "I cry when a freakin' butterfly hits the windshield." Sociopaths are never content to portray themselves as average people: they must show themselves to be more noble and more tenderhearted than normal people.

After Martin Brown's death:

After hearing a knock, June [Martin's mother] opened the front door to find Mary standing there. "Mary smiled and asked to see Martin. I said, 'No, pet, Martin is dead.' She turned round and said, 'Oh, I know he's dead. I wanted to see him in his coffin,' and she was still grinning. I was just speechless that such a young child should want to see a dead baby and I just slammed the door on her."

That is amazingly ghoulish for an 11-year-old. 

"Murder isn't that bad, we all die sometime anyway."
-- Mary Bell to one of her guards

This is reminiscent of Ted Bundy saying, "Why's everybody so upset about a few missing people for? There are so many of them." Or of Richard Speck being asked why he killed those eight nurses and replying, "Just wasn't their night, I guess."

Serial killers often seem not to fathom the immensity of their crimes.

Once she was in jail, Bell showed two of the deadly triumvirate of traits that often distinguish serial killers (along with pyromania), bedwetting --

Mary, who had been a chronic bedwetter, was terrified of going to sleep, for fear that she might mess her bed. "I usually do," she confided. At home, Mary's mother severely humiliated her whenever she wet the bed, rubbing her daughter's face in the pool of urine, said Mary, years later. She then hung the mattress outside for the entire neighborhood to see.

-- and torturing animals: 

Mary's hostility had an almost naive quality: while tightly grabbing a stray cat by the neck, a guard told her not to hurt the cat. Mary allegedly replied, "Oh, she doesn't feel that, and anyway, I like hurting little things that can't fight back." In another incident, a police woman said that Mary said she'd like to be a nurse, "because then I can stick needles into people. I like hurting people."

(Is that how those serial-killing nurses get their start?)

Mary Bell's mother was undoubtedly a sociopath herself:

"Take that thing away from me!"
-- Betty Bell, responding to the birth of her daughter Mary (Mary's Mother)


The most disturbing abuses came from Mary's frequent drug overdoses, which were likely administered by her mother. When Mary was one year old, she nearly overdosed after taking some pills that were hidden in a narrow nook inside a gramophone. It seemed impossible that the baby could reach the pills, and strange that she would eat so many of the "acid-tasting" medication. When Mary was three she and her brother were found eating "little blue pills" along with the candy their aunt Cath had brought for them. (Betty said, "they must have taken the bottle out of my handbag.") Cath and husband offered to adopt Mary, but Betty refused to let the child go, and soon broke off contact with her family.

In the most serious overdose, Mary swallowed a bunch of "iron" pills belonging to her mother. She lost consciousness and her stomach had to be pumped. A young playmate, as well as little Mary herself, said Betty Bell gave Mary the "Smarties" candy that made her sick. Overdoses, particularly for a developing child, can cause serious brain damage, a common trait among violent offenders.

Betty Bell was a drama queen and loved to play the martyr. She may have suffered from "Munchausen by Proxy Syndrome," thriving on the attention over her little daughter's tragic "accidents." This syndrome, first described in 1977, is characterized by caregivers who intentionally injure, suffocate, or poison their child for the sympathy of others. The "MSBP" mother usually had an unwanted child, or is unmarried. This may explain why Betty, despite the harm she caused Mary, always wanted her back.


Munchausen's, and Munchausen's-by-proxy, are merely facets of sociopathy. Reading about the abuse Mary Bell suffered as a child makes you feel sympathetic toward her, until you remember the monster that she herself became.


Since her release in 1983, Bell has fought hard for her anonymity, and has for the most part been successful, despite a few attempts by the media to unmask her. She has had a daughter, who has reportedly forgiven her mother for her childhood crimes, and Bell was reported to have become a grandmother in 2009. She was managed to stay out of trouble since her release, though her character can't possibly have changed.

A sympathetic 2001 article in the Telegraph described her life since her release. Some excerpts:

...As her full release date neared, she became frightened over her future. One friend said: "Even on the night before her release, Mary longed for the security of a prison cell where she would feel safe, know what time the light would be put out and when she would be woken in the morning.

"Mary told me that she had an incredible feeling of sadness and betrayal. She was floundering without an identity, saying that she was 'torn to shreds inside'." On the night before her release, Bell said that she had cried for "the past, my friends, the waste, the loss, my life. I cried and grieved for what I had done." Bell said that although the Parole Board had seemed to forgive her, she could not forgive herself.


Given that Bell is unquestionably a sociopath, it's hard to believe that she was so full of self-doubt; that is simply not in the gamut of sociopathic emotions. Grieving for what she had done, at least in the sense of feeling bad for the two boys she killed, would also be out of the question. As would not being able to forgive herself. But she knew what to tell her friends, and tell the press, in order to sound normal.

The article concludes with this paragraph:

Bell has told friends that while she has been happy at times since her release, there is always a part of her that is never content. "I am imprisoned by guilt and remorse," she once said.

A sociopath, of course, is never "imprisoned" by those two emotions. But the more intelligent ones learn to counterfeit the normal gamut of emotions as they get older.

Bell is now 60, not quite at the stage where strangers would help her cross the street. It's hard not to wonder how strangers perceive her, and what their reactions would be if they knew who she was.

28 comments:

Anonymous said...

Creepy, creepy people, Sociopaths....

We had a recent case here in Illinois, whereby a female Chinese grad student turned up missing. Luckily (so to speak), surveillance camera footage captured her getting into a car that pulled up next to her as she waited at a bus stop (rumor has it the perp may have flashed a fake badge claiming to be an undercover cop). The footage turned out to be extremely crucial evidence, eventually leading to the perp. In the meantime there was a frenzy of publicity as folks blanketed the town with missing person fliers and posters, as well as organizing a touching public vigil that attracted a large crowd of friends, family and supporters. Emotional speeches about the missing victim were given, banners featuring her photo were waved. Pictures were taken of the large crowd that made the news and various online media outlets. A day or two later a suspect, Brendt Christensen, the owner of the car caught on camera, was arrested. And...? Well well, wouldn't you know -- photos of the vigil from days before show Brendt Christensen himself amongst the supporters in the crowd. The man likely responsible for Yingying's kidnapping (and it is believed her death, though after 100 days her body still has not been found) had the audacity to attend her vigil, mingling with her frantic and bereaved family, friends and supporters. Can you imagine him standing there, checking it all out, soaking it all up, listening to the passionate heartfelt speeches, observing the tears, all while knowing he was the cause of it all...??? How satisfying for him -- I'm sure it must have been quite a thrill. Bastard. These people are sickos....

As for Brendt Christensen, for all that he was apparently a "brilliant" physics master’s student, he was clearly a dunce in crime. As 'smart' as he supposedly was, he managed to leave a very damning trail to follow. Then was too dumb to realize he was being surveilled by law enforcement for weeks ( -- and yes, including AT the vigil). So much for that Sociopathic cunning instinct. Whatever the case, he sits in jail now awaiting trial. He’s in big trouble since kidnapping is a federal crime (meaning the death penalty may be a possibility). Hopefully the evidence against him is enough without a body (though here’s hoping hers may still be found). And thank goodness he screwed up enough to get caught, and quickly too. They just may have nabbed a future serial killer in the making (assuming he hasn't killed already and this was his first)...:

http://www.cnn.com/2017/07/05/us/illinois-kidnapping-suspect-bail-denied/index.html

John Craig said...

Anon --
You're so right. I had heard of that missing Chinese girl but hadn't really followed the case closely. Yes, turning up at vigils and funerals and even volunteering to be part of the search group is always an added thrill for serial killers. You described it perfectly:

"How satisfying for him -- I'm sure it must have been quite a thrill. Bastard."

Sometimes I think students are often described as "brilliant" sorta the same way all porn actresses are labeled "porn stars." (Come to think of it, have you ever heard of a "porn starlet?") Maybe he was, maybe he wasn't. I guess you do have to be smart to begin with to be going for your PhD in physics, though. I've talked to a couple of physics PhD's who've said you don't have to be that smart to do that, but they may have just been being modest. (Or, maybe they were trying to set themselves apart from the other PhDs.)

Anyway, you're right, he wasn't a brilliant criminal. I just read an article about him in which a colleague was quoted as describing him as "awkward." Maybe he had Aspergers. Most of the photos that I saw of him showed him wearing a sort of smirk. He looks sort of creepy, but then again, when we already know someone was a budding serial killer, it's hard not to read that type of thing into a photograph of them.

Anonymous said...

Indeed, I see a smirk in his photos as well -- a very self-satisfied, smug expression. I do believe Brendt Christensen thought he was some hot stuff. Note that he does actually have a beautiful wife, so apparently not everyone finds him creepy. Not to mention also a cute girlfriend besides, with whom he was photographed with at the vigil (I know, WTH...???) and who was apparently wearing a wire which captured some sort of spoken admission from him that lead to his arrest. Like I said, maybe not quite as clever as he thought he was, eh...? The following link has some more comprehensive details about the case, including photos of his wife, his girlfriend, and the vigil -- plus even his OK Cupid profile (in which he mentions his 'open relationship') that someone was apparently able to grab before it was expunged. In any case, what a piece of work...:

https://www.google.com/amp/s/truecrimespodcasts.com/2017/07/02/more-details-emerge-in-yingying-zhang-case-as-the-search-for-her-continues/amp/

John Craig said...

Anon --
He actually sounds surprising normal in that OK Cupid profile. Maybe a little taken with himself, but most guys are, so it doesn't really stand out.

He did look as if he was enjoying himself in that picture of him at the vigil, the one where he's holding his girlfriend's hand.

Anonymous said...

Plus this brief news segment linked below (which aired shortly after his arrest in July) shows Brendt Christensen marching in the vigil with his girlfriend (all while keeping a tight grip on her shoulder). Pretty weird, no...?....:

https://www.cbsnews.com/videos/did-illinois-man-admit-to-abducting-chinese-visiting-scholar/

Anonymous said...

Yes, I'm sure he probably wouldn't reveal too much weirdness in an OKCupid profile (like the fact he'd been surfing abduction fantasy websites. Probably a good idea to leave that out if you're trying to attract a new mate ;-) ). However I do find the following bit ever-so-slightly disconcerting, taken in context knowing what we now know...:

"I'm Brendt. Grad student at UIUC. I'm pretty chill and easy going....it's pretty much impossible to make me mad. I want to experience everything and test my limits"



Hmmm, "pretty much impossible to make me mad". Is it just me or is that kind of an odd thing to say? And if it is true in that he never gets mad, then isn't that a rather Sociopathic trait right there...??? Sociopaths often can't and don't feel the normal range of emotions, correct...?

And this: "I want to experience everything and test my limits". Hmmm, "everything" indeed (not limited to and including what it could possibly feel like to engage in the ultimate taboo of taking another person's life perhaps...???)

Ok ok, so I"m probably projecting a little too much into this, but to me those few words do feel a bit like potential wee sociopathic hints somehow, here in the aftermath....

Anonymous said...

Yes, Mary Bell is well-known here in the UK. So well known that new identities for offenders is termed a "Mary Bell order". I heard a different story about how the police suspected her of murdering that small boy. I heard that she drew a picture of the murder scene and added things that only someone who was present could have known (there was a small bottle of pills next to the boy, and she drew that into the picture. The pill bottle wasn't reported in the newspapers).

What is it with sociopaths and bed-wetting? The last time I did that was when I was six, but I've heard of sociopaths doing it until much older - 12 or more. From what I've read, it's a genuine difficulty they have, rather than them doing it deliberately to annoy caregivers. I read somewhere that sociopaths typically have different levels of vasopressin to non-sociopaths, which would explain it, if it's true.

Assuming you don't already know of them, the child murderers of James Bulger (Robert Thompson and Jon Venables) are also very well known in the UK - so well-known that people are trying to unmask them all time, to kill or seriously hurt them. I'm not sure whether they're sociopaths or not; it's hard to tell. It would be good to have your verdict on this.

- Gethin

Anonymous said...

A recent post of a sociopath, but this time without thin lips.

-Ga

John Craig said...

Anon --
Weird? Yes, but also pretty typical behavior for a serial killer. They like to savor the ruckus they've caused, as well as the pain of the grieving relatives.

There have been serial killers who will phone up the grieving relatives for years, taunting them.

John Craig said...

Anon (in response to your 10:31 comment)--
I think the "pretty much impossible to make me mad" was an attempted signal to put potential responders at ease, letting them know he wasn't temperamental. You're right that sociopaths don't feel the normal range of emotions, meaning, they don't feel the positive emotions like love and affection and gratitude, but anger is definitely part of their emotional repertoire. Look at it this way: you'd have to be awfully angry at some level to want to kidnap and kill an inoffensive stranger.

Keep in mind, sociopaths are also known for being dishonest, and I'd interpret the above statement as an example of that.

The "test my limits" thing is something you hear from young people all the time. I think they think it makes them sound adventurous and ballsy. In retrospect, yes, it could be seen in a more macabre light; but I'd see it, too, as just an attempt to come across normal, more evidence of dishonesty than anything else.

John Craig said...

Gethin --
Yes, I read that story about how Bell incriminated herself too. (I don't think I said anything in the post to conflict with that.) At 11, Bell had all the instincts of a vicious serial killer, but hadn't yet developed the subterfuge of a successful one.

I had always thought that the bed-wetting thing had something to do with the fact that they were so uninhibited that they would just let loose in the middle of the night rather than bother to get up to go to the bathroom. (But I was never entirely convinced by my own theory.) this is the first I've heard of vasopressin.

I heard of Robert Thompson and Jon Venables for the first time while reading about Mary Bell, and just read the Wiki account of their crime:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_James_Bulger

The first part of the article made it sound as if Thompson was the ringleader; often when you have a killer pair, one of them is a manipulative sociopath and the other is just a weakling who goes along. This is most evident with those male-female pairs; it's almost always obviously the male who is the "real" serial killer, and the female is jus tin thrall to him. (The "proof" of this is that females almost never kill for sexual satisfaction, usually it's either for money, as with black widows, or because they want to appear heroic, as with those serial killer nurses who intend to bring their patients to the brink of death so they can then subsequently come in to "save" them.)

But, it's been Venables who's been in trouble with the law since his release. Looking at the pictures of the two boys when they were young, it's Thompson who had the more predatory cast to his face -- to the extent you can tell anything from a single photo of a 12-year-old.

Anyway, the answer to your question is, I just can't say for sure. I think you pretty much have to assume that Thompson is a sociopath, just from the viciousness of the murder; and it's likely that Venables is as well. But the Wiki account said nothing about their family backgrounds, which often gives a sense of what someone is. And we know little of what they've been up to since, other than Venables' brushes with the law. So while I can't say for sure, I'd certainly be willing to bet that Thompson is a sociopath; Venables, I'd want slightly better odds on. (Venables was said to have nightmares about the murder for years afterward, but Thompson evidently felt no remorse.)

Anonymous said...

Venables keeps getting drunk and outing himself, meaning the government keeps having to give him new identities (at the taxpayer's expense). Apparently, he does this because the stress of keeping his past to himself is too much. Other than that he's in a gay relationship, I can't find anything on Thompson. Like Bell, he seems to have moved on without outing himself or getting into trouble again. The Daily Mail says he's working as a nightclub bouncer, but the DM is notorious for making things up so I won't believe that until I find a more reliable source.

- Gethin

John Craig said...

Gethin --
The original murder of Bulger had homosexual overtones (police thought there had been a battery stuck in his anus as well as in his mouth), so it's not surprising to hear Thompson is gay. The fact that Venable is so subject to stress is actually a slight bit of evidence that he may not be a sociopath.

Anonymous said...

Sociopaths are very good about being close mouthed (keeping mum) about their past (and current) transgressions.

- birdie


John Craig said...

Birdie --
Yes, that would help explain both Mary Bell's and Robert Thompson's abilities to fly beneath the radar.

Steven said...

The murder in an abandoned house reminded me of the serial killer Albert Fisher and this letter he wrote one of his victim's mothers:


http://www.viralnova.com/fish-letter/

John Craig said...

Steven --
Amazing. So many of them seem to double their enjoyment by torturing the bereaved afterwards. What was amazing about Bell was that she had all of these instincts fully developed by age 11. I wonder how she treated her own daughter, and what her daughter turned outline. Was she a sociopath as well?

Whenever we hear about these mother who have Munchausen's by Proxy, and end up killing their own children, I often think that as much as we feel sorry for those poor children, the fact is, they probably would have grown up to be sociopaths themselves, just as Mary Bell did.

I also wonder about what the rest of us would have turned out like had we had a mother like Betty Bell, who evidently tried to kill Mary on several occasions. At one level, you have to feel sorry for her, and realize that she basically had no choice but to try out as she did, and that most of us would likely have done the same. That said, a monster is a monster, whatever caused it to become that way, and there's no question that's what Mary Bell was.

Fled The Undertow said...

Serial killers often like to savor the pain of grieving relatives; and at age 11, Bell had all of those instincts.

This past summer, I helped out at a day camp for 3- to 9-year-olds. There was a 6-year-old girl I'll call Maya who's mother was the first parent to drop her kid off every morning, and last to pick her up in the evening (despite not having a job outside the home she had to go to). Plus, it was ONLY MAYA who was enrolled in day camp; 4-year-old sibling got to spend all day every day with Mommy, tagging along as Mommy went to yoga, shopped at Whole Foods, or got her nails done. (Younger sibling seemed like a "normal" kid, FWIW. Mommy had some ready-made excuse about wanting Maya to play with older kids or something, when we all knew that Mommy and younger sibling wanted to enjoy their summer weekdays without Maya.)

I said from the very first week that Maya was a sociopath, and of course I earned the self-righteous "tsk-tsk-tsk" from the liberal admins for committing the sin of "labeling" a child. But I knew it wouldn't be long until Maya proved me right. The third week of camp, for example, we teachers tried to keep a close eye on Maya during outside time, since she was determined to "play pranks" on kids. Maya's pranks mainly consisted of identifying her peers' vulnerabilities, then exploiting them solely for her own entertainment.

One afternoon close to the end of the day, Maya told a weepy three-year-old suffering from separation anxiety that her mommy "wasn't coming back for her, but that's okay because she's going to live with Maya and her family from now on". Maya sounded totally convincing, and she quickly had the poor preschooler in full-blown panic attack mode by the time one of us was able to run over and intervene.

Maya got "spoken to" in front of her own mother that day, as well as the little girl and HER mommy, for that "prank". She also lost privileges that week. But nothing ever seemed to faze her. Maya's excuse for her little prank? "I was just making a joke. I wanted to see what would happen." Very clinical and detached. This is just one of several incidents with her that I could describe. (It was a long summer.)

A Mary Bell already well in the making.

John Craig said...

Fled --
Wow, great story. And you had her pegged right, from the start. You have a good eye.

But I wonder what it was that made the mother favor her other daughter so much? Maya's personality must have come from the mother. Is it possible that the mother was in fact Maya's stepmother and that the other daughter was her biological daughter, with Maya having come from the husband's previous marriage? (And that Maya's biological mother was an unfit parent, so the father got custody?)

I'd be really curious to find out exactly what that family dynamic was, I bet there's an explanation there that would give us an "aha" moment. Is it possible that Maya was adopted before the mother and her husband were able to have a biological child of their own? And that Maya didn't have anyone to bond with for the first year or two of her life?

It's gotta be something. I doubt it was just that Maya was bad seed from the moment of birth.

Fled The Undertow said...

This is what I know:

Both kids belong to the parents, as they definitely resemble Mom and each other. We live in a resort town, so their family (like scores of others) just live here for the summer to escape the heat and humidity of the big southern city where they live during the school year.

Maya also seems to have traits of Histrionic

Fled The Undertow said...

Sorry...my phone died.

...Histrionic Personality Disorder. She is overly-interested in talking about "boyfriends, kissing", and having her Barbie dolls sleep in the same bed. I often overheard her suggest to friends, "Let's pretend we're both Princesses and our parents are dead. The Princes are coming to rescue us."

John Craig said...

Fled --
Hmm. So much for my theory. I can understand why the mother doesn't want to spend time with her now, but at a certain level, she has to be the mother's creation.

Yes, Histrionic is one of the four Cluster B's, and the one least talked about. I've looked back in my life and tried to figure out who the histrionics were, and could only come up with a couple. (I could only come up with two Borderlines, too, although I'm sure I must have known more.)

Let's pretend our parents are dead. Wishful thinking, I guess. That second daughter better watch out, Maya's going to take revenge some day for her having been the favorite.

Anonymous said...

The first picture of Mary, she's creepy, ghostly looking.

- Susan

Anonymous said...

Regarding Maya...that is an interesting story. Maya is only six yet is talking about having boyfriends and kissing. Has a need for her Barbies to sleep with her...and imagines both parents dead. Maya is the oldest daughter. Is she being sexually abused by dad? Does she want her Barbie dolls in bed with her so she won't be alone with dad while he does his "thing". Does Maya want her parents dead because her father does "things" which hurt her and her mother does not protect her? Maya may not know what is being done to her is wrong, but she knows it does hurt her physically but has been told to never talk about it. And of course, with both parents dead, she wants someone to come save her. Regarding the other little girl that Maya said would be coming to live with her...maybe Maya, at such a young age, felt this other little girl would actually come live with her if she could convince the little girl that her parents were dead? Maya might think that another girl in the home would be beneficial to her in several ways. Just thinking out loud. I could be way off base.

Hannah

Anonymous said...

One more thing about Maya...this seems like a wealthy family or at least very comfortable. Two homes. One for the summer when it gets too hot and the the other home for the rest of the year. Maya's mother seems to be enjoying her life...does not have a job, running around shopping, getting nails done etc. so if they are "well off" then the father must be the bread winner. Is Maya's mother willing to overlook her husband's peculiar habits and sacrifice Maya so she can keep the way of life her husband provides for her? Does Maya's mother rationalize that Maya is now beyond help (at the age of 6) and shower the other daughter with love to make up for some subconcious guilt? Maya's mother wants Maya to play with older kids. Is this because the mother knows Maya will be less tempted to reenact sexual behavior with an older kid and the family secret will be kept secret?

Hannah

John Craig said...

Susan --
Honestly, she just looked feral to me in that first picture. I was also struck by how sweet-faced she was in the second picture.

John Craig said...

Hannah --
Actually, that's a great thought, and it makes perfect sense. It would explain why she acts the way she does, and it would also explain why the mother dislikes her (she's "jealous" of her, at a certain level). And all those other details you provide dovetail nicely too. Bravo. (That hadn't even occurred to me.)

John Craig said...

Hannah --
That makes even more sense. Great theory. I wouldn't be surprised at all if it were true. Fled -- what do you think?