Search Box

Loading...

Tuesday, September 18, 2012

Is Obama gay?

When I first heard a few days ago that Obama might be gay, my initial reaction was, that's ridiculous. He's married, has two kids, and he's never set off my gaydar. I had read a couple years ago about Larry Sinclair's claims of having given Obama oral sex in the back of a limousine when Obama was a state senator. But at the time I just figured that any famous person is bound to attract a few loonies who will say anything to get publicity.

But after I read the article linked two posts ago (and directly below), I started reading more about the rumors of Obama's gay life, and after a while, it just made too much sense not to be true.

In his article in WND.com, Jerome Corsi, a Harvard Ph.D. in political science, said that Obama (along with Rahm Emanuel) was a lifetime member of Man's Country, a gay bathhouse in Chicago. Obama was evidently well known there and many of the older clientele remembered him:

Investigative journalist Wayne Madsen, who worked with the National Security Agency from 1984 to 1988 as a Navy intelligence analyst, confirmed DuJan’s claims.

“It is common knowledge in the Chicago gay community that Obama actively visited the gay bars and bathhouses in Chicago while he was an Illinois state senator,” Madsen told WND.


Obama's reputation in gay circles, by the way, was that he liked to receive oral sex but not to give it, which squares with what Larry Sinclair had said about him. (It's his "signature." And receiving blow jobs but not giving them would be consistent with Obama's narcissistic personality.)

As a member of the Reverend Jeremiah Wright's Trinity United Church of Christ, Obama was known to have a "close friendship" with Donald Young, the openly gay choir director of the church. Young was murdered execution-style on December 23, 2007, just as Obama began his climb toward the Presidency. Another gay member of the church, Larry Bland, had also been killed execution-style a month earlier. Neither man was robbed, and both cases remain unsolved. Donald Young's mother believes to this day that her son was killed in order to silence him before he spoke out about Obama.

Jerome Corsi is dismissed by the Left as a "Tea Party activist and conspiracy theorist." But even if you regard Corsi and Madsen and Dujan with suspicion, what they say fits the larger picture of Obama's life far better than any heterosexual narrative would. The circumstantial evidence -- away from his public image as a family man -- fits the homosexual narrative perfectly.

There is virtually no record of Obama having had any girlfriends before he married Michelle at age 31. He referred to two in his autobiography, but these were later revealed to be "composites." Are we to believe that a healthy, young, sports-oriented black man had no history of having chased after girls? You'd think that after he'd first been elected as President, back when he was seen in such a messianic light, all sorts of women would have come forward claiming that they had had flings with Obama, or at least been propositioned by him. But none did.

In his autobiography, Obama stated that during his years at Columbia he spent all his time in the library and "lived like a monk." But if he spent all of his time in the library, shouldn't he have gotten excellent grades, especially given how smart he is supposed to be? Then why spend a million dollars hiring 11 lawyers to make sure his academic records were permanently sealed? It's also hard to believe that a young man who by his own admission freely imbibed drugs was otherwise inclined to live "like a monk."

Another question: how many successful black men marry women far darker than themselves? If successful black men do marry black, it's often a woman so light-skinned you have to look twice to ascertain her blackness. This tends to be true of successful blacks in business, in entertainment, and in sports. Obama wasn't rich when he married Michelle, but he was a Harvard Law School graduate and did give the impression of an ambitious young man on his way up. And young gay men with political ambitions are more concerned about simply having a beard than her desirability. (Ironically, it was said during the '08 election that black women voters had a particular fondness for Obama because he had married a "real" black woman, unlike so many other successful black men.)

Michelle, in turn, also married Barack out of ambition. She reportedly had divorce papers drawn up after he lost an election to Bobby Rush for a House seat in 2000.

When Barack was first elected President, Michelle wanted to stay in Chicago and raise their two girls there. She was quickly informed that this would not look good, so she moved to the White House.

Has a President's "body man" ever been given such prominence? Part of Reggie Love's job as Obama's personal valet was to "wake the President up in the morning." (How could he do this without waking Michelle up at the same time?) Love reportedly worked up to 18 hours a day, "often sleeping on the burgundy couch."

The "body man" before Love was Nick Colvin, who left the White House after rumors surfaced that he had had sexual relations with Obama while Obama was a state senator. (Obama hasn't had just one Clyde Tolson, he's had two.)

And why all the snickering when Kal Penn ("Kumar" of Harold and Kumar fame, widely known to be gay in Hollywood) was working in the White House as the President's Associate director in the White House Office of Public Engagement? Google "Kal Penn Obama affair" and you'll get 165,000 results.

The ways in which Obama tries to compensate seem telling too. His jaunty stride up to the podium is meant to project masculine virility; and his vocal delivery, with that faux vaguely-black accent, is meant to show manliness as well. I've seen other gay guys who try too hard to appear manly, with overly emphatic movements, and it usually leaves the opposite impression.

You never, ever hear any whispers about Obama and women. Sure, there are stories about power struggles between Michelle and other women, like Oprah Winfrey and Desiree Rogers; but no stories about Barack straying with women. I had always just assumed that this was because he was a squeaky clean family man who was perhaps a little scared of Michelle. But for a healthy man who ascended to the Presidency at age 48, who had star power and unlimited access to women, to never, ever indulge? That would be practically unheard of. But no, there will be no Monicas for Barack. 

Obama has essentially been hiding his sexuality in plain sight all this time. In retrospect, I'm astonished at my own blindness. (There has evidently been chatter about his sexuality on the internet for years.) But he just never set off my gaydar. And he is, after all, President of the United States, a position we associate with homosexuality about as much as, say, Brigadier General.

In a way, it's almost racist not to see Obama's gayness. Sometimes it's hard to see past the blackness: we are conditioned to assume all black males are high testosterone potential rapists.

Obama has none of the sheepishness, or sense of furtiveness, that we sometimes associate with gays. But maybe he doesn't give off that vibe because his narcissism overrides any possible sense of embarrassment.

Obviously, none of the "evidence" I've presented is hard; it's merely circumstantial. The only people with firsthand evidence are those who've had sex with Obama. But the entire picture of Obama's life makes much more sense when you see it through the prism related by Corsi and Madsen and Dujan.

There's nothing intrinsically immoral about being gay; it's something homosexuals generally have no choice about. But with Obama, his duplicity about his sexuality is reflective of his duplicity about virtually everything else. He has employed Alinsky-ite methods to hide his gayness the same way he has employed them to hide his far left political leanings. (Alinsky: cut your hair, wear a suit and tie, appear moderate, hide your radicalism, and if anybody disagrees with your political views, attack him on personal grounds.) 

At this point, three and a half years into Obama's Presidency, his sexuality has to be open secret in Washington. The White House press reportedly knew about JFK's escapades with women at the time, but kept them quiet. They are undoubtedly performing a similar function with Obama.

(By the way, if you don't believe that Obama is gay, go ahead and laugh at me. But the truth should become much more widely known after Obama has left the Presidency, when the press no longer has a reason to protect him.)

You have to wonder whose idea of a joke it was when Newsweek put out that famous cover of him with the rainbow halo over his head and titled it, "The first gay President." (In fact, Obama is probably the second; James Buchanan was most likely gay as well.)

I also can't help but wonder what effect would it have on the upcoming election if Obama's homosexuality became more widely known. And while I don't blame Obama for his sexuality, I do hold it against him that he's such a con man and narcissist. He's also obviously out of his depth as President, and his rigidly leftist mindset precludes any realistic ideas about how the economy works.

It's Obama's personality and politics, not his sexuality, which will determine my vote. But there are many who wouldn't vote for Obama simply because he is a homosexual. So I do hope this becomes more widely known in the next seven weeks. 

If you see this post, please pass it on. (Click on the headline of this post, then copy the address and email that. Or press on the Facebook or Twitter buttons below) Thank you. 

35 comments:

Anonymous said...

John--All I can say is wow! The question for me now is, is he actually gay or could he simply be androgens, as some people are? Plus, how could I have been so duped as well. Great article! Brian

Baloo said...

Yes, this needs to be passed around everywhere. It's partly quoted and linked here:
http://ex-army.blogspot.com/2012/09/obama-metro-or-homo-or-both.html

John Craig said...

Thank you Brian. My opinion, he's gay. Please pass the post along.

John Craig said...

Baloo --
Thank you, as always.

taylor said...

Everything about Obama's past seems very shady... Have you seen '2016'? I don't recall any posts about it...

Whatever the case, I think D'Souza is sort of stretching the truth to fit his argument, but I still find Obama's history very strange. I usually do not care much about the personal aspects of a candidate- just what they've done professionally and what they promise to do. For those reasons I already did not like him- now I am very suspicious of his history. Hiding his grades, possible homosexuality, strange family history, association with socialists and anti-colonialists, weird political dealings in Chicago. All put together it's pretty bizarre he's President, AND no one (the press) has ever addressed it.

What do you think?

p.s. I'll share the link, but it will be lost on college liberals etc..

John Craig said...

Taylor --
No, haven't seen "2016."

There's no question there are a lot of gaps in Obama's history. He was part of a corrupt machine in Chicago. The Rezko connection. His disjointed family history. His flaky mother. And while you can't hold Obama responsible for his weird family, we have to ask what he's hiding about his college years. No President in history has ever had his college records sealed like that. What is Obama hiding? At first I thought it was just that he wanted to hide the extent to which he was a beneficiary of affirmative action -- and I am dying to see his SAT and LSAT scores -- but now I think it's something darker.

Thanks for passing this along.

WJGBalderama said...

Could he be bi-sexual?

Anonymous said...

The trip to Pakistan was what convinced me. I suspect he went there to participate in some young boy love without any chance of repercussions. But John! You miss the danger here. If Obama is gay he is subject to blackmail, and THAT is a national security nightmare.

FUBO said...

"I want to emphasize, there's nothing immoral about being gay; it's something you either are or you aren't, and you have no choice in the matter."

BS, BS, and more BS.

(and oh yeah, Obama's a flamer - you only "didn't notice" because you wanted him in there to sodomize America for you.

John Craig said...

WJGBalderama --
I don't think he's bi, all the rumors are about men.

Anon --
I have to think that his homosexuality is such an open secret within his administration by this point that he's actually not that much at risk for blackmail. And there's been chatter on the internet about it for quite a while (I'm evidently a little late to the party here). But for the average voter to realize he's gay, the mainstream media have to say it (and not just metaphorically, as Newsweek did), and no mainstream media publication is about to do that, whether or not a blackmailer informs them.

FUBO --
What I always tell people who think homosexuality is a choice is, could you just will yourself into wanting to suck penises if you wanted to? No? Then it's not a choice.

I didn't vote for Obama in '08, by the way, because by then it was already obvious that despite his post-partisan, post-racial rhetoric, he was a committed far leftist. (And wanted to sodomize the country, in your words.)

Pete said...

To get an insight into him one should look at the sorts of women he seems to pick and prefer: Sotomayor, Kagin, Napolitano, Angela Corey, etc. All horrible, dowdy, dyke-like creatures, not a normal seeming one in the bunch. His own wife is rather masculine in appearance and has bigger shoulders than he does. Lots of gays seem to adore these tough seeming females. What a person prefers in other people can give subtle clues as to what's going on upstairs.

John Craig said...

Pete --
Good point, I hadn't thought of that.

Then again, if you're going to pick a liberal woman for some political position, it's hard to find a good-looking, feminine one. Liberal women tend to look like Rachel Maddow, conservative ones tend to look more like the ones you see on Fox News. That's an exaggeration (on both sides), of course, but it tends to be truer than not.

Mr Z said...

"There's nothing nothing inherently immoral about being gay; it's something homosexuals have no choice about"

yes and no. even a lot of homosexuals seem skeptical about the idea that male bisexuals aren't just halfway out of the closet, but there do seem to be a decent amount of "hasbians" (different from Biblically motivated ex-gays) who were lesbian for a substantial period of time. there's been plenty of pieces written about the supposed fluidity of female sexuality blahblahblah.

probably a small minority but they do exist.

John Craig said...

Mr. Z --
Actually, I agree with you. Female sexuality is far more what Freud referred to as "polymorphously perverse" than males' sexuality, which tends to get fixated not only on one gender, but often on one body part.

Anonymous said...

My husband said when he started reading your piece on Obama he thought "ridiculous" but by the end he was more than half convinced.

John Craig said...

Anon --
That was basically the thought process I went through except that by the end I was 99% convinced.

Harry Baldwin said...

I have to disagree about the daughters. the tall Sasha with her high forehead looks very similar to Barack Obama, while the darker, more coarse-featured Malia looks more like her mother. (Though it's hard to tell at her age.)

It's not as if you can't be gay and father children.

As far as the sealed college transcripts, I suspect that's because he took all Marxist-oriented courses.

John Craig said...

Harry --
Sasha is lighter-skinned, but she has none of the Alfred E. Neuman cast to her features that Obama does. I agree, Malia looks like Michelle, but that still begs the question of her father. And yes, there are plenty of gays who have managed to father children, one way or another.

The sealed college records could mean anything. At first I just assumed that his SATs/LSATs/grades were lousy and he didn't want the extent to which he was an affirmative action baby known. But I've heard several other plausible possible reasons since, including the question of who paid for his education, the possible trouble he might have gotten into for drugs, clues to his homosexuality, or, as you suggest, the Marxist orientation of his electives.

ren Hoyze said...

Wow , I have not and will never vote for Obama because of his socialist, Marxist views, but this one I didn't even think about. I've heard people joke about it once in a while but never gave it a thought and then I read that article you mentioned at the top about the bathhouses in Chicago, and now reading this , it does all make sense! I wonder if trumps bombshell has anything to do with this? Great article btw

John Craig said...

Ren --
Thank you. My reactions were basically the same as yours: I'd never vote for him because he's far left, but I'd never given a second thought to his sexuality. Then, once I read that article by Corsi, it all fell into place.

I've heard a rumor that Trump's revelation has to do with the Obamas having filed divorce papers, which would have something to do with his sexuality.

Marianne said...

Never set off your gaydar? Really? First time I saw the guy, I suspected.

John Craig said...

Marianne --
Then yours is sharper than mine.

Kurt said...

I wonder whether Obama ever frequently any of the rest stops outside of Washington D.C. to service the penis and ass needs of horny truckers?

Anonymous said...

Even if he was gay would that persuade Americans to not vote for him? I don't care who he sleeps with male or female, as long as he does a good job running not ruining this country. That's just an open minded opinion on the whole is he or isn't he question?

John Craig said...

Anonymous --
I agree that the relevant question for voters should be whether he's done a good job running the country, regardless of whom he sleeps with. But there is a small subset of people who would not vote for him if they found out, and another tier of voters who might just be less inclined to show up at the polls. Given that I think he's been a disastrous President -- apart from the question of his sexuality -- I hope he doesn't get re-elected. And if what it takes is more people knowing that he is gay, fine.

Anonymous said...

Jeremiah Wright's "church" was United Church of Christ, not Baptist.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeremiah_Wright

Russ D

John Craig said...

Russ D --
Thank you, I'll make that change.

Anonymous said...

You've been fooled about "homosex-" in general at least as badly as you've been fooled about 0bama. Please read the 2005 article "The gay invention" at www.touchstonemag.com on how "homosex-" is both a linguistic and a moral error (homo=same+sex=opposite!?). Also see www.DrJudithReisman.org re the Kinsey fraud and how the world in general (and the US in particular) has been taken over by perverts far more easily than it was by the Nazis. Also google & see The Pink Swastika.
Russ D

John Craig said...

Russ D --
How have I been fooled by Obama? A large part of this blog has been devoted to explaining how people should NOT be fooled by that con man.

I agree that Kinsey was a dissimulator who mostly wanted to legitimize his own homosexuality. But I couldn't find that other link; if it was saying (I'm guessing here from what I saw of Touchstone) that homosexuality is a sin or a choice, I disagree. I don't think anybody can really choose their own sexuality.

Anonymous said...

I just stumbled onto this article several months after the fact. My "gaydar" went off during the first few months of his first campaign. I saw a photo of him with his shirt sleeves rolled up, hanging a curtain in a community center. He reminded me of my X-husband, who left me for another guy. I have been convinced of Obama's preferences ever since I saw that photo.

John Craig said...

Anon --
You've got better gaydar than me.

And sorry about your husband, but really, you're better off without him.

Anonymous said...

WND is especially known for its accurate reporting (said no one ever).

John Craig said...

Anon --
I wouldn't have written this post if it was based on just one source. But it's based on a lot of things: the Globe report. What Donald Young's own mother said. Obama's own autobiography, which mentions only two girlfriends, both of whom are later revealed to be "composites." All of Obama's close friendships with various apparently gay men. And Michelle's demeanor and appearance. And take a look at the article I linked last month, "Obama's young male golfing buddies." It all adds up to a pretty consistent picture.

The truth will come out eventually.

Doccus Rockus Maximus said...

I only just recently became aware of the fact he was so well known in gay circles, and that anyone who could be a threat in exposing that fact was executed gangland style immediately before the start of his political life. This indicates two very disturbibbng things, that poewerfiul people had his future already mapped out in advance, and tyhat he had no moral compass whatsoever. There's no difference between a heterosexual prostitute addict and a gay bathhouse frequenter, even if you believe homosexuality is not a "choice". Murdering witnesses and lying about ones education, sexual persuasion and original names on a legal document. having 54 SSNs, and three names on property documents, heavy cigarette, drug and alcohol use, lewd, violent and obscene behavior in front of press junkets, blatant violations of the law and constitution, abysmal academic acheivements, and a highly suspectprevious "legal career" and, I swear, God knows what else.. makes me stunned that this criminal ever got elected. Clearly there are powerful corrupt people behind the scenes with God knows what motives at work, here...

John Craig said...

Doccus --
This is the first I've heard of 54 SSN's or violent or obscene behavior in front of press junkets. As far as the other stuff, though, that's a pretty good summation of Obama's character.

I was shocked myself when I first heard of how he might be gay, then, once I started putting it all together, it was the only alternative that made sense given the larger picture of his life.